Compare and contrast Fowler's and Wilber's theories of spiritual development. How do you think these models are useful to social work practice? Cite examples of why you think they are useful.
What will be an ideal response?
The major difference between the two models in terms of individual development is that Wilber provides more substance and specification than Fowler does about what transpersonal levels of development look like and how they evolve. Wilber also provides more detailed descriptions of the potential pitfalls of spiritual development than Fowler, who provides only a general overview of the possible dangers or deficits of development at each of his faith stages. However, Fowler provides more specifics about the content and process of spiritual development at the pre-personal and personal phases. In terms of their utility for social work practice, we could say that Fowler's model is more descriptive and Wilber's is more prescriptive. Both theories have been critiqued in a number of areas. Their use in social work may be dubious since there is little empirical support for either approach.
You might also like to view...
According to Lowen (1965), a bioenergetics therapist, __________ emotional problems are manifested in a disturbance in breathing
a. all b. most c. some d. few
Many European Americans and White American ethnics grew up in families that discouraged emotional expression in favor of
a. the family's welfare. b. self-control and self-sufficiency. c. a strong work ethic. d. a collectivist society.
During which stage do clients most address specific feelings, thoughts, and behaviors they would most like to change?
a. Stage 1: Establishing a working relationship b. Stage 2: Identifying clients' problems c. Stage 3: Helping clients create goals d. Stage 4: Encouraging clients' exploration and taking action
An assertion statement such as "I need for you to take a deep breath, exhale slowly, and put the gun down!" is a/an ____________statement
a. owning b. closing c. genuine d. reflective