What are the differences between realist (including neorealist) and liberal scholars of international relations and foreign policy? Discuss the different assumptions and units of analysis for each theory. Which theory better explains the current U.S. foreign policy environment?
What will be an ideal response?
Answers should define realist schools of thought as those that focus on a pessimistic view of human nature and an anarchical global system. Liberal schools of thought focus on a more positive view of human nature and look to dependent and institutional relationships among states in the international system. Realists tend to focus on interstate relations, whereas liberals focus on opening the “black box” and looking inside nation-states. Answers regarding current U.S. foreign policy will vary but could point to the false dichotomy often discussed about the two theories.
You might also like to view...
In Engel v. Vitale, the Supreme Court held that
A. it violates the establishment clause for government to compose official prayers. B. it violates the free exercise clause for government to compose official prayers. C. it violates the establishment clause for government to support school vouchers. D. it violates the free exercise clause for government to support school vouchers. E. it is constitutional for government to sponsor school prayer if it is voluntary.
Dealing with public sector labor unions is a major focus of state and local government in many states
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of these is a characteristic of single-party systems?
a. They lack ideological commitment. b. They are generally poorly organized. c. They lack competition and accountability. d. They foster too much competition to retain stability.
Which of the following international organizations was created in 1945 to extend credit to nations for purposes of building and economic development?
A) The United Nations B) NATO C) OPEC D) The World Bank E) The Federal Reserve Bank