What are arguments supportive of the use of regulatory analysis by presidents as a legitimating tool?
What will be an ideal response?
Presidents have greater legitimacy than the unelected bureaucracy and their use of regulatory analysis serves as a check on that bureaucracy. This is especially true given the low public opinion of the bureaucracy. Further, because regulatory analysis utilizes “rational” techniques, regulations that survive this process are more likely to contribute to the overall well-being of society.
You might also like to view...
The dominant public perception of drug users during the 1980s was primarily one of _____________?
A. sympathy B. denigration C. cooperation D. indifference
According to the laws of war, __________.
A. effort needs to be made to expand warfare to the combatants and to expose civilians when possible B. leaders of government may not be killed, mistreated, or forced to disclose information beyond their name, rank, and serial number C. armed forces must respect the neutrality of the Red Cross in its support of civilians and prisoners of war during war D. states are allowed to use overwhelming force if it ends a conflict early and prevents further casualties
The most widely shared political activity is _____
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
In which case did the Supreme Court rule that new media of communication must be scrutinized as they are developed and that varying media result in varying protections?
A) Regina v. Hicklin B) Roth v. United States C) FCC v. Pacifica Foundation D) Ginsburg vs New York