In Forgie-Buccioni v. Hannaford Brothers, where Forgie-Buccioni was detained in a grocery store's security room after being accused of not paying for Drixoral cold medicine, the appeals court held that:

Question

a. there was a tort of false imprisonment because the defendant's employees intended to confine Forgie- Buccioni
b. there was a tort of false imprisonment because the defendant's actions resulted in confinement c. there was a tort of false imprisonment because Forgie-Buccioni was aware of the confinement d. all of the specific choices
e. none of the other specific choices

Answer 1

d