Why did the Supreme Court rule against the 2011 class action suit alleging sex discrimination against Wal-Mart?
a. The Court ruled that the plaintiffs had not established that their cases were similar enough to proceed as a class.
b. The Court did not find sufficient evidence of sex discrimination.
c. The Court found that the classification based on sex passed the heightened scrutiny test.
d. The Court found that the classification based on sex passed the rational basis test.
Answer: a
You might also like to view...
The election of Abraham Lincoln set the stage for
a. the Civil War. b. the Great Depression. c. the Korean War. d. the American Revolution.
The U.S. forces in IFOR (Implementation Force)
in Bosnia during the 1990s were adequately equipped and instructed to destroy attackers; these robust rules of engagement incited violent rebellion from Serbian forces. Indicate whether this statement is true or false
In Federalist 10, James Madison warned about the dangers of factions
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Explain the concept of prior restraint of the press. Include one example of how the Supreme Court has ruled on this issue.
What will be an ideal response?