Under what circumstances could a judge be considered not impartial (biased)? Cite relevant cases
What will be an ideal response?
Judges are not considered impartial when issuing warrants if they seek to gain financially from doing so. Likewise, judges presiding over criminal trial cannot have a financial stake in the outcome. For example, in Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927), the judge of court that heard the defendant's case was also the city mayor. In addition, he received the fines and fees that he levied against those convicted in his courtroom. The Supreme Court concluded that due process is violated when the judge "has a direct, personal, substantial pecuniary interest in reaching a conclusion against him in his case."
A similar decision was reached in Ward v. Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57 (1972). However, in that case, the fees or fines collected by the judge did not go directly to the judge, but instead were paid into the town's budget. The amount of money collected was apparently substantial. The Court concluded, again, that due process was violated, this time stating that "the mayor's executive responsibilities for village finances may make him partisan to maintain the high level of contribution from the mayor's court." Contrast this decision with that of Dugan v. Ohio, 277 U.S. 61 (1928), in which the Supreme Court held that due process was not violated because the judge was one of several members of a city commission and, as such, did not have substantial control over the city's funding sources.
You might also like to view...
Major cost issues encountered when implementing computerized mapping include software, hardware, training, and data acquisition
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
In missing children cases, even though parents insist that they have already made a search, a careful inspection of the inside and outside of the premises should still be made.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
In which U.S. Supreme Court case were the provisions of the exclusionary rule extended to the states?
A. Terry v. Ohio (1968) B. Kentucky v. King (1849) C. Weeks v. United States (1914) D. Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Juvenile court codes specify the conditions under which states can ________ intervene in a juvenile's life
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word