If resources were the basis for dividing the world, where would the national boundaries be? How would they be determined?
By ecosystems? By major continents? By agricultural productivity? By geographic obstacles, such as mountain
regions or rivers?
What will be an ideal response?
? Regarding the first part of the question, the answer is clear. The existing national boundaries would be erased
in almost all cases.
? The remaining parts of the question are less simple and there are no right answers. Look for logical groupings
of soil and water resources to allow for food production and drinking water. Look for allocation of fossil fuel
resources. Consider the effect of similar land and climate. For instance, the southern parts of Texas, New
Mexico, Arizona, and California have more in common with Mexico than they do with the remainder of the
United States.
You might also like to view...
What are the four morphological stages of seedling growth for plug production?
What will be an ideal response?
Technician A says that if the sun gear is driven while the ring gear is held, the planet gears will walk around the inside of the ring gear. Technician B says that if the sun gear is driven while the carrier is held, the ring gear is forced to rotate at a slower speed than the sun gear. Which technician is correct?
A) Technician A only B) Technician B only C) Both technicians D) Neither technician
The force of the magnet is strongest at two areas on the magnet called the ____.
a. poles b. spectrums c. endpoints d. currents
A(n) ____________________ is a rigid body that is capable of transforming energy to provide a designed motion and force.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).