Describe the "Comprehensiveness" criterion as it is applied to the evaluating comparative reasoning
Give an original example of two contrasting comparisons for the same object; first give one that is more comprehensive and then supply one that is less comprehensive.
What will be an ideal response
Comprehensiveness is the extent to which a comparison captures a greater number of central or essential features. One possible pair of examples: For a teacher finishing the semester is like completing a mural; there were lots of different and interesting parts to the project. Finishing it was both challenging and gratifying. And, you get to start another mural real soon. For a teacher finishing the semester is like housework, repetitive.
You might also like to view...
A theory-neutral observation would never need to be thrown out by later scientists
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
INSTRUCTIONS: Select the answer that best translates the statement into a standard form categorical proposition. She eats when she's hungry
A) Some times she's hungry are times she eats. B) Some times she's hungry are times she does not eat. C) All times she eats are times she's hungry. D) All times she's hungry are times she eats. E) No times she's not hungry are times she eats.
Empedocles taught that everything was affected by the two forces of
a. gravity and magnetism. b. love and hate. c. expansion and contraction. d. the kingdoms of light and darkness.
Which of the following best describes a causal argument?
A. an event that is known to bring about a change or effect B. an argument that lists the similarities between man-made and natural things C. an argument that uses the words "similar to" D. an argument that claims that one thing will lead to other things