Determine whether the following symbolized argument is valid or invalid. If invalid, provide a counterexample; if valid, construct a deduction.(P v Q) ? (C & D)~C/? ~Q
What will be an ideal response?
Valid. The deduction could look like this:
1. (P v Q) ? (C & D)
2. ~C/? ~Q
3. ~C v ~D 2, ADD
4. ~(C & D) 3, DEM
5. ~(P v Q) 1,4, MT
6. ~P & ~Q 5, DEM
7. ~Q 6, SIM
You might also like to view...
How are all air conditioning compressor clutches applied and released?
What will be an ideal response?
According to Augustine, evil is defined as:
a. a lack of goodness. b. discord among the parts of the soul. c. an excess of emotional states. d. pain and suffering. e. none of these answers.
Imagine a shopkeeper who is honest because being honest is good for business. When the shopkeeper refrains from
cheating a customer, Kant would say this action
a. was wrong because its motive was impure. b. was in accordance with duty, but not done from duty. c. displayed a high level of moral worth. d. shows that he was following the categorical imperative
Put this statement into standard form: There are no philosopher kings.
What will be an ideal response?