Determine whether the following symbolized argument is valid or invalid. If invalid, provide a counterexample; if valid, construct a deduction.(P v Q) ? (C & D)~C/? ~Q
What will be an ideal response?
Valid. The deduction could look like this:
1. (P v Q) ? (C & D)
2. ~C/? ~Q
3. ~C v ~D 2, ADD
4. ~(C & D) 3, DEM
5. ~(P v Q) 1,4, MT
6. ~P & ~Q 5, DEM
7. ~Q 6, SIM
You might also like to view...
Imagine a shopkeeper who is honest because being honest is good for business. When the shopkeeper refrains from
cheating a customer, Kant would say this action
a. was wrong because its motive was impure. b. was in accordance with duty, but not done from duty. c. displayed a high level of moral worth. d. shows that he was following the categorical imperative
According to Augustine, evil is defined as:
a. a lack of goodness. b. discord among the parts of the soul. c. an excess of emotional states. d. pain and suffering. e. none of these answers.
Put this statement into standard form: There are no philosopher kings.
What will be an ideal response?
How are all air conditioning compressor clutches applied and released?
What will be an ideal response?