What was the patronage system and what is its modern equivalent? How do the older and more modern systems compare?
What will be an ideal response?
The patronage system was the practice of handing out federal jobs to the supporters of the party that had won the presidency. The modern equivalent is political appointees, wherein the president can select whomever he/she chooses for certain administrative jobs and will often award these to supporters. However, the scope of political appointments is smaller than the patronage system. That said, the selection of employees on a basis other than merit can create problems if these individuals are not competent to perform the job.
You might also like to view...
The "mass line" meant that the CCP
A. was a party of the masses. B. was dependent on the masses and mindful of their interests. C. used deceitful propaganda. D. organized workers and demonstrators for rallies.
The country of Utopia recently established its first democratic government after decades under a Fascist regime. Subsequently, a country that it shares its border with
began a political revolution and elected a democratic government in the country. This result was credited to the ________ of Utopia. A. bandwagon effect B. Coriolis effect C. cohort effect D. placebo effect E. neighborhood effect
Which decade saw a marked decline in American attitudes toward government?
A. 1980s B. 1970s C. 1990s D. 1950s E. 1960s
Attempts to reform the financing of campaigns have been overwhelmingly successful
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.