What are the arguments for and against electing judges and appointing them for life?
What will be an ideal response?
There is considerable debate over whether judges should be appointed for life or elected for specific terms. The rationale behind appointment for life is that it takes the politics out of the judicial process. A judge will be selected based on his or her credentials as opposed to the quality of his or her campaign skills or the size of the campaign budget. Once in office, the judge is free to make honest decisions without having to worry about the impact of any decision on reelection. Of course, this independence is just what makes some people prefer elected judges. They point out that the members of every other branch of government are elected and are, therefore, forced to represent the will of the people; they argue that judges should represent the people no less than members of the other branches.
You might also like to view...
Grace wants to set goals for a team that she leads. She should remember to make the goals ______.
A. soon B. manageable C. difficult D. measurable
If the financial status of a corporation drastically changes before the record date, a declared cash
or property dividend can be revoked. Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Bagsby owns a business selling insects for organic gardening. Bagsby is seeking a loan from First Natural Bank. The loan officer is asking that the loan be secured by Bagsby's inventory of insects, now owned or hereafter acquired. In order to do this, a new security agreement will need to be signed each time Bagsby gets new insects or sells his insects
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The contribution margin per unit expressed as a percentage of the product's selling price is the:
A. Margin of safety. B. Contribution margin ratio. C. Rate of return on sales. D. Volume variance. E. Break-even point.