Explain the pros and cons of the defense giving its opening statement after the prosecution has given its statement (rather than reserving the opening statement until the state has concluded its case). If you were in the role of defense attorney, which would you chose? Why?
What will be an ideal response?
In many jurisdictions, the defense attorney has the option of reserving the opening statement until the state has concluded its case and the defense case is about to begin. The advantage of this is that it allows the defense to size up the state's case, point out evidence that the state promised in its opening statement but failed to deliver, and generally respond more effectively to the evidence (or lack thereof) presented by the prosecution. On the other hand, deferring the opening statement means that the defense attorney does not get the opportunity early on in the trial to present his or her version of the case or to persuade the jury to view the evidence from the defense perspective.
You might also like to view...
The transit workers with the greatest risk of robbery are
a. taxi drivers. b. bus drivers. c. subway train operators. d. railway train conductors.
Federal law currently does not prohibit theft of computer programs or computer fraud
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The three-pronged approach to address the gang problem uses a balance of which three strategies?
a. intervention, motivation, and suppression b. prevention, intervention, and suppression c. intervention, transition, and motivation d. penetration, suppression, and prevention
Explain Rawls’ “difference principle” and provide an example.
What will be an ideal response?