How important is it to have someone in the meet and confer who is knowledgeable in electronic discovery?
What will be an ideal response?
Having someone who understands the client's IT will help the legal team comply with requests that might be made. The same person is likely to have sufficient knowledge to understand the opposing party's computer file system and how to best access that information. The presence of the IT person can make the electronic discovery process easier for the legal team.
You might also like to view...
"Isn't it true that you saw the murderer's face?" is an example of a(n) __________ question
a. Open-ended b. Closed-ended c. Hypothetical d. Leading
Sal buys a farm from her lifelong friend, Fred. She pays $12,000 per year for fifteen years. She trusts Fred, so she does not put the deal in writing. Ten years later, Fred sells the same property to Nell (on a written contract), who evicts Sal. Sal sues Fred. Why won't a court enforce the contract between Sal and Fred?
A. The Statute of Frauds B. The undue influence rule C. The duress rule D. The unconscionability rule
Refer to the instruction above. Suppose that, after Mr. Wilson agrees with Dennis to let him mow his lawn, Dennis tells Mr. Wilson he can't do it because he has baseball practice. "But Joey's willing to do it instead," Dennis says. "All right," Mr. Wilson replies. "I'll pay Joey the same amount to mow my lawn." What type of transaction has just occurred?
A) a third-party contract between Mr. Wilson and Joey to benefit Dennis B) an assignment from Dennis to Joey C) a delegation from Dennis to Joey D) a novation between Mr. Wilson and Joey
Adam and Zeke, two composers, share the same agent Creative Arts, Inc. Adam left his latest composition with his agent at the offices of Creative Arts. One month later, Adam noticed that Zeke's new song was nearly identical to the one he left at Creative Arts. Can access by Zeke to Adam's song be inferred??
What will be an ideal response?