Name two situations in which a court would most likely find a lack of proximate cause in a strict liability case.
What will be an ideal response?
a. A defendant will not be strictly liable if the harm occurred only because the plaintiff was conducting an "abnormally sensitive" activity.b. Some courts will also relieve defendants of liability if the harm occurred in an unforeseeable manner. An "act of God," for example, is often enough to relieve a defendant of strict liability.
You might also like to view...
There are no typical legal research assignments since the issues can vary significantly
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A trial notebook is a summary of:
A. Copies of legal authority B. Jury instructions C. Sections for witnesses D. Outlines for openings, closings, and potential questions E. Exhibits F. All of the above Indicate whether the statement is true or false
?If something is considered defamation per se it means that:
A. ?proof of injury or harm is required for the false statement to be actionable. B. ?the false statement is not considered defamation unless it is spoken. C. ?no proof of injury or harm is required for the false statement to be actionable. D. ?the false statement is not considered defamation unless it is written.
What is the difference between a putative father and a presumed father?
What will be an ideal response?