What constitutional principle did the Supreme Court address in the case of United States v. Mara, and how did the court rule?
What will be an ideal response?
In United States v. Mara, the Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of taking a handwriting sample without the consent of the suspect. The court ruled that this did not constitute an unreasonable search and seizure of a person and hence did not violate Fourth Amendment rights.
You might also like to view...
The process whereby we attempt to reduce the import of hazards, terrorist attacks, and disasters before they occur is called:
A) mitigation. ?B) process. ?C) risk. ?D) assessment.
The ________________ is a federal agency that tracks the movement of persons who enter and exit the borders of the United States
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The system for how police and emergency response agencies will organize their response to attacks and disasters is called the ______.
a. Department of Homeland Security b. Federal Emergency Management Agency c. Joint Terrorism Task Force d. Incident Command System
Compared to other Western democracies, the United States makes little use of fines as the sole punishment for crimes more serious than motor vehicle violations
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false