Explain the leading cases in the area of racial profiling
What will be an ideal response?
In Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), Washington, D.C., police made a traffic stop and observed two bags of crack cocaine in the hands of a passenger who was seated in the front of the car. The police testified that they stopped the driver because he had violated traffic laws. In contrast, the defendants claimed that the stop was made based on their race and that the police used alleged traffic violations as a reason to stop them.
You might also like to view...
Police generally are not liable for ________ conduct on the part of a detainee that results in injury to that detainee
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
The K-S test for a single sample is appropriate for data measured according to the nominal level of measurement
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
Xavier is a state judge who is presiding over a case of homicide. During the hearing, the defense attorney proves that certain mitigating factors accompanied the crime. According to state sentencing guidelines, the defendant should receive three to five years in prison. Xavier, however, sentences the defendant to two years in prison as he feels that a three- or five-year jail term would be too harsh. Which of the following allows the judge to differ from the sentencing guidelines of the state?
A. The principle of just deserts B. The truth-in-sentencing laws C. Judicial restraint D. Judicial departure
What is a hot product?
What will be an ideal response?