State legislators act as ombudsmen. Discuss
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response would be:
State legislators help translate public wants and aspirations into laws and regulations. In addition to their lawmaking functions, they also try to be ombudsmen—to listen, learn, and find solutions to problems. Invariably, state legislators wind up doing a lot of favors: getting a merchant a license to sell lottery tickets, persuading a state agency to look into safety standards at the local hospital, pushing for funds to repair county roads, arranging for a campaign supporter to be appointed to the state labor commission, and so on. State legislators are accessible.
You might also like to view...
Who are the most likely people to be convinced by the media?
a. people with low levels of political attentiveness and few predispositions b. people with high levels of political attentiveness and many predispositions c. people with moderate levels of political attentiveness and many predispositions d. people with moderate levels of political attentiveness and a moderate number of predispositions e. people with low levels of political attentiveness and no predispositions
________ play a major role in implementing the state's realignment reform
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Namibia typifies a low-income developing country in the following way. It has
a. dictatorial one-man rule that began a few years after independence. b. another African country as its former colonial ruler. c. a trade-dependent relationship with its former colonial ruler. d. confiscated lands from their white owners. e. a history of revolts against the government.
In a series of well-publicized Supreme Court rulings in 2005, Kentucky was required to remove the Ten Commandments posted in some of its county courtrooms. However, Texas was allowed to keep a monument on the state capital grounds that had the Ten Commandments listed. How did the Supreme Court rationalize the Kentucky circumstance as unconstitutional, but not the Texas case?
a. Texas was a sovereign nation prior to becoming a state and was allowed to retain some of its religious sovereignty. b. Kentucky did not have the same level of adequate legal representation during the proceedings as Texas did. c. The Texas case used a newer, more modern interpretation of the Ten Commandments that was considered less controversial by the Supreme Court. d. The Kentucky case was considered to be motivated by a desire on the part of legislators to advance religion, whereas the Texas case involved a monument outside the state capitol, which is essentially a passive act. e. The Supreme Court showed its bias toward western states.