How did the Supreme Court treat gerrymandering issues in 2019?
A. It allowed partisan gerrymandering by ruling that judgments about it are beyond the reach of the judiciary.
B. It allowed partisan gerrymandering based on the principle that no level of gerrymandering can be "too partisan."
C. It disallowed partisan gerrymandering by ruling that the courts should not be burdened with questions of redistricting
D. It disallowed partisan gerrymandering based on the argument that it violates the "one person, one vote" principle
Ans: B. It allowed partisan gerrymandering based on the principle that no level of gerrymandering can be "too partisan."
You might also like to view...
The U.S. war in _____________ was fought against _______________.
A. Afghanistan; al Qaeda and the Taliban regime B. Iraq; al Qaeda and the Taliban regime C. Syria; the Hussein regime D. Iraq; the Assad regime E. Afghanistan; the Hussein regime
California's Constitution is unique as it contains
a. tax breaks for veterans. b. a right of privacy c. a right of happiness. d. freedom of religion.
Which of the following is an activity that lobbyists regularly engage in?
a. answering e-mails on behalf of elected officials b. speaking on behalf of elected officials at press conferences c. providing elected officials with information about an issue or bill that is important to the group d. providing legal counsel to members of Congress
__________ are the most inelastic of the major taxes used in the United States
a. Graduated income taxes b. Non-graduated income taxes c. Personal and real property taxes d. Sales taxes e. Excise taxes