The experts who testified at this trial believed the school board failed to provide adequate training for school personnel. Without training, school personnel will most likely underestimate the lethality of suicidal thoughts, statements, and attempts. The conclusion of this expert testimony was that the student would not have committed suicide if the employees had been adequately trained
Persuaded by this input, the court held that the school could be found negligent for failing to notify the decedent's mother. This explains the court decision in which court case?
a. Eisel v. Board of Education
b. Wyke v. Polk County School Board
c. Hedlund v. Superior Court
d. Ewing v. Goldstein
b
You might also like to view...
Which of the following was NOT stated in the text as a way to verify conclusions in qualitative data analysis?
a. Assess the values and expectations of the person analyzing the data. b. Consider negative evidence or deviant cases. c. All of the answers were stated in the text. d. Have more than one researcher analyze the same data.
Jellinek's major contribution was
a. in his work with war trauma b. to identify multiple alcoholisms c. display his knowledge of the Greek alphabet d. to introduce the harm reduction model.
Some probation and parole officers are also social workers
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
How can research be used in human service work?
A. To determine which students to accept into a training program B. To determine which clients should and should not be accepted in a given treatment environment C. To assist in program evaluation D. To figure out how to best obtain grant money