How does the relationship between emotion and logic change over the life span?
What will be an ideal response?
Across the life span, there is an increasing integration of emotion and logic in one's thinking. Older adults tend to make decisions based on pragmatic and emotional grounds, not simply on logical grounds. Roles and rules are viewed as relative, not absolute. Older adults realize that thinking includes compromise with others and that contradictions and ambiguity must be tolerated. One example of this is how young adults differ from middle-aged adults when considering the topic of unethical behavior in the workplace. Whereas younger adults would be more likely to view this behavior as completely unacceptable, older adults would be more likely to take into account contextual factors that may have caused the person to act in an unethical manner.
You might also like to view...
The values in a chi-square distribution are always greater than 0 and:
A) are normally distributed B) less than 1 C) can be quite large D) are negatively skewed
Mikhael is examining the symbolic elements of a standard police encounter, such as the behaviors and clues an officer encounters that could signify danger. What sort of qualitative research is he performing?
a. Semiotic analysis b. Memoing c. Coding d. Concept mapping e. Grounded theory
In terms of social order, voluntary associations
a. defy it. b. ignore it. c. provide an alternative. d. help maintain it.
Discuss the origins of the nuclear family — When and why did it supersede the extended family? What problems are faced by nuclear families as opposed to extended families? What does it mean to say the nuclear family is "gendered"? Whose "sphere" is it?
What will be an ideal response?