Describe how people resolve moral dilemmas in real life, and compare that process to their approach to hypothetical problems such as Kohlberg's "Heinz dilemma."
What will be an ideal response?
Kohlberg's theory emphasizes rationally weighing alternatives when solving hypothetical moral dilemmas. Real-life conflicts, such as whether to continue helping a friend who is taking advantage of you, often elicit moral reasoning below a person's actual capacity because they involve practical considerations and mix cognition with intense emotion. Although adolescents and adults still mention reasoning as their most frequent strategy for resolving these dilemmas, they also refer to other strategies-talking through issues with others, relying on intuition, and calling on religious and spiritual ideas. And they report feeling drained, confused, and torn by temptation-an emotional side of moral judgment not tapped by hypothetical situations.
You might also like to view...
The ways in which people of different generations differ from one another are considered to be what?
a. Cohort effects b. Negative aftereffects c. Adaptation effects d. Reinforcement effects
Head-sparing is the biological process that protects the brain when malnutrition affects body growth
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
Support for a claim that is based on a story about an individual or event is called ___________ evidence
A) anecdotal B) narrative C) objective D) authoritative
How do approach and avoidance overlap with the Big Five?
What will be an ideal response?