In a hypothetical situation in which you are given the opportunity to save two innocent people by killing one, what would the utilitarian philosophy recommend?
a. It cautions that you should save the two lives only if you can do so without hurting anyone at all.
b. It would say that any killing is wrong and should be avoided, no matter what the outcome.
c. It suggests that an individual cannot make moral decisions of this complexity and must rely on a higher power to do so.
d. It would suggest that it does not matter what the action; the killing of one to save two balances out equally.
e. It says that if you have the opportunity to save two lives at the cost of one, you should do it.
Answer: e
You might also like to view...
The Federalist Papers are a valuable resource for those who want to reflect on the thinking of the Framers
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
In the case Texas v. Johnson (1989), the Supreme Court addressed the issue of
A) prior restraint. B) freedom of assembly. C) flag burning. D) libel. E) obscenity.
Party labels
a. offer a serviceable shorthand cue that keeps voting decisions cheap and simple for the voters. b. are basically misleading and tend to confuse voters. c. are usually downplayed during elections so voters do not normally know the party affiliation of the candidates. d. no longer mean anything to most members of the electorate or candidates.
Which agencies provide somewhat redundant service to the president and exist to assist the president in controlling and coordinating the executive branch of government?
A. executive departments B. Executive Office of the President C. independent executive agencies D. independent executive commissions