Discuss the ex post facto law prohibition and how it applies to criminal cases in today's courts. Additionally, give examples of cases where ex post facto has been a factor
What will be an ideal response?
Should include a discussion of the ex post facto law and what it means to filing of cases, prosecution, and convictions based on non-existent laws before the commission of the crime. The answers must include specific cases based on ex post facto laws.
You might also like to view...
Which famous philosopher is considered to have originated the doctrine of consequentialism?
a. Jeremy Bentham b. Thomas Kent c. John Stuart Mill d. Aristotle
The admissibility of potentially prejudicial evidence in a trial is determined by the:
a. Defense attorney b. Prosecutor c. Appellate judge d. None of the above
In Arizona v. Gant (2009), the Supreme Court ruled: a. when a police officer makes a lawful custodial arrest of an occupant of an automobile, he may alwayssearch the passenger compartment
b. police may search a vehicle incident to an occupant's arrest only if the arrestee is within reaching distance ofthe passenger compartment at the time of the search or it's reasonable to believe the vehicle containsevidence related to the offense of arrest. c. police may search a vehicle's passenger compartment incident to a lawful custodial arrest of an occupant ifthey have probable cause to search. d. police must rely on inventory searches in order to search the passenger compartment of a vehicle.
The political boost that the FLQ needed came from an unexpected direction. On a visit to Montreal in 1967, the French President Francois Mitterand, in what has become a famous speech, ended with the phrase, "Vive le Quebec Libre" (Long live free Quebec)
a. True b. False