Explain how withholding information from juries provides an example of welfare liberalism.
A. Withholding information from juries does not provide an example of welfareliberalism at all and should never be done in a democratic society
B. Because some information may be prejudicial and/or irrelevant to a case,withholding or discounting that information reduces the chances that the jurywill reach a fair verdict.
C. Because some information may be prejudicial and/or irrelevant to a case,withholding or discounting that information increases the chances that the
jury will reach a fair verdict.
D. Because some information may be prejudicial and/or irrelevant to a case,
withholding or discounting that information constitutes obstructing justice in a
criminal case.
C
You might also like to view...
Nel Noddings argues that
a. Care is superior to principles b. Love is superior to rights c. Duties are superior to caring d. Ethics is culturally relative
If truth is relative, then the same statement can be both true and false.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
A man brutally murders an innocent victim. According to Epicurus, in what way would this act rightly be considered “evil”?
a. Such an act is a direct violation of the divine commandment: “Thou shalt not kill.” b. Such an act is a direct violation of the victim’s unalienable right to life. c. The criminal is doing irreparable harm to his immortal soul. d. Such an act is evil insofar as it engenders a fear in the mind of the criminal of eventually being caught and punished severely by the civil authorities.
The Tooley's Cat thought experiment is intended to show that
A. being a potential person is a necessary condition for having a right to life. B. being a potential person is a sufficient condition for having a right to life. C. being a potential person is not a sufficient condition for having a right to life. D. cats have a right to life.