Discuss the five schedules used to classify psychoactive drugs.
What will be an ideal response?
• Schedule I – controlled substances that have no established medical usage, cannot be used safely, have great potential for abuse.
• Schedule II – drugs with high abuse potential for which there is a currently accepted pharmacological or medical use. Most are considered to be addictive.
• Schedule III – drugs with a lower abuse potential that have an accepted medical use but may lead to a high level of psychological dependence or to moderate/low physical dependence.
• Schedule IV – drugs with a relatively low potential for abuse that are useful in established medical treatments, and involve only a limited risk of psychological or physical dependence.
• Schedule V – prescription drugs with a low potential for abuse and a very limited possibility of psychological or physical dependence.
You might also like to view...
Relocation diffusion occurs when crime emerges in one place and spreads outward from that point
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. The physical design of a prison has little importance to the facility’s operation. 2. Movement of inmates out of the cell block or pod often requires restraints and security staff escorts. 3. Most early prisons tended to be located in metropolitan areas. 4. Supermax facilities can be freestanding facilities where the entire facility consists of this higher security level or they can be a specified section of the facility that has additional security features that make it a supermax facility. 5. Supermax facilities provide the highest level of prison security.
Scholars often view public defenders as better than assigned counsel because public defenders are full-time government employees who are specialists in criminal law
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following is not an essential element of therapeutic jurisprudence?
a. immediate intervention c. treatment programs b. hands-on judicial involvement d. adversarial adjudication