In his arguments against psychological egoism, James Rachels exposed three underlying "confusions" that account for the persistence of this view over time
Explain psychological egoism and the three "confusions."
- Psychological egoism: The view that we are compelled by our psychological makeup always to pursue our self-interest above all else.
- Rachels pointed out that these "confusions" are false:
- Confusion 1: The idea that "selfishness" means the same thing as "self-interest."
- Confusion 2: The idea that every action is done either from self-interest or from other-regarding motives.
- Confusion 3: The idea that a concern for one's own welfare is incompatible with any genuine concern for the welfare of others.
You might also like to view...
Desjardins and Duska argue that employers do not have a right to expect optimal
performance from employees.
a. True b. False
Any definition by example of the word "terrier" would also qualify as a definition by example of the word "canine."
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
The "Passion" refers to
A. the feelings and desires of Jesus' life. B. the suffering and death of Jesus. C. the longing for the Parousia. D. the zeal for fighting evil.
The following statement forms are particular in quantity
a. I and A b. I and O c. E and A d. E and O