The history of which of the following cases illustrates the “double security” of federalism by which the states can take up issues when the federal government cannot or will not help?
a. Kelo v. City of New London
b. McCulloch v. Maryland
c. United States v. Lopez
d. United States v. Morrison
e. Wickard v. Filburn
b. McCulloch v. Maryland
You might also like to view...
Presidents have been largely successful in getting treaties
A. approved by the World Court. B. through both the House and the Senate. C. approved by the Supreme Court. D. through the Senate. E. approved by the State Department.
Question Period in the House of Commons gives members of Parliament the opportunity to ask each other embarrassing questions
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
A zero-sum game refers to the situation in which
a. one state can gain only at the expense of another. b. both states can gain at the same time. c. neither state can gain and both will lose. d. both states can cooperate with one another.
Which of these occurred in many formerly colonized nations after World War II?
a. Elite colonizers occupied top government positions. b. Authoritarianism was quickly replaced by democracy. c. Democracy was quickly replaced by authoritarianism. d. Religious majorities established theocratic democracies.