Why did the United States implement the laissez-faire approach to solve urban problems?
What will be an ideal response?
In the past 20 or more years, urban policy has changed dramatically, with a decided shift toward a more laissez-faire approach. The Reagan and Bush administrations argued that a strong and healthy economy is a far more promising approach to solving urban problems than direct federal intervention. For laissez-faire advocates, the key role of the federal government in solving urban problems is to keep the economy healthy, not to intervene directly with federal programs and funding. States and cities should be allowed to choose which services they need and want. The result of this shift has been a catastrophic decline in federal support for cities since 1980. Federal programs have been turned over to the states and cities, and the states and cities—in poor financial shape themselves—have drastically cut or eliminated the programs.
You might also like to view...
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
“Vulnerability” means that the family is very close to the poverty line.
Interval-ratio measurements can be all of the following except:
a. nominal. b. continuous. c. discrete. d. observable.
Which one of the following is one possible explanation of median income differences between men and women?
a. Female employees encounter a glass elevator. b. Male employees encounter a glass ceiling. c. Many women leave the workplace to care for children and elderly parents. d. Employers over-invest in childbearing-age women only to see them leave the workforce.
Children taking care of their elderly parents really means _______:
a. siblings taking care of both parents b. adult females taking care of their mothers c. adult males taking care of their fathers d. the government assumes responsibility for the elderly