How do the realist, liberal, and identity perspectives understand the causes of Latin America’s lost decade?
What will be an ideal response?
The realist perspective argues that the Lost Decade was the result of American neocolonialism and intervention. The liberal perspective argues that the Lost Decade was the consequence of insufficient market interdependence and weak domestic and regional institutions. The identity perspective argues that the Lost Decade is the outcome of conflicting ideologies and conflict among classes or ethnic groups.
You might also like to view...
In The Slaughterhouse Cases (1873), a narrowly divided Supreme Court upheld a state grant of a monopoly in the slaughtering business in
a. New Orleans, Louisiana. b. Houston, Texas. c. Chicago, Illinois. d. None of the above is true.
The late 1960s marked the start of __________
a. dealignment b. the New Deal coalition c. the era of good feelings d. the third-party era
How does the president fulfill the constitutional requirement to tell Congress about the state of the union?
A. gives a yearly address B. meets with congressional leaders C. proposes a yearly amendment D. sends a yearly report
International customs are __________.
A. limited in their overall import on the international stage B. often a failure in peacekeeping C. a source of international law D. analogous to international constitutions