Do you believe there is room for psychology in the courtroom as a mitigating-aggravating factor,
or do you believe the outcome for a criminal offender should be based entirely on the crime(s) committed without regard for the offender's psychological characteristics and background?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: One side of this debate is that psychology should not play a role, and that the outcome should be based entirely on the crimes committed. This is a very conservative view that holds little compassion for the mentally ill or developmentally impaired offender. The other side of the debate argues that in order for the element of mens rea (intent) to be present, a person must be able to understand the implications of their actions. This is the more liberal position, and they would also argue that a person's upbringing and background should be considered when dispensing justice.
You might also like to view...
The range of criminal conspiracies includes ____________________
a. deprivations of civil rights b. illicit drug trafficking c. violations of antitrust laws d. all of these
Periodic meetings to determine whether the conditions of the case plan for an abused child are being met by the parents or guardians of the child are called _____
a. Sentencing hearings b. Juvenile delinquent hearings c. Review hearings d. Juvenile justice hearings
List and define three areas of prosecutorial discretion and discuss the benefits and pitfalls of each area
What will be an ideal response?
The term "violent injury" has a special meaning in assault and battery cases
Indicate whether the statement is true or false