Discuss and define the crimes of arson and criminal mischief
What will be an ideal response?
Arson has grown beyond its common law origins of punishing arsonists who burned occupied homes to include almost any kind of building, vessel, or vehicle. It's a crime against possession and occupancy, not ownership. The actus reus of arson is a burning, which modern statutes have defined as "setting a fire" and can include an explosion. The mens rea is maliciously or willfully intending to burn someone else's property. It is a general-intent crime which means that all that is needed is the intent to set a fire. The arsonist need not intend to cause harm to the structure or anyone inside the structure.
Criminal mischief is damaging or destroying property. There is much variation in statutes across the country concerning criminal mischief. Generally, the actus reus can include (1) burning, exploding, flooding, or committing some other dangerous act; (2) tampering with property, even if it does not cause harm; and (3) deception or threats that cause a person to suffer loss.
You might also like to view...
Investigators should never make use of the "cognitive interview technique" with children
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following is not a technique of deceptive interrogation?
a. Misrepresenting the seriousness of the offense b. Misrepresenting the moral seriousness of the offense c. Fabricating evidence d. Physical coercion
__________ are areas where many incidents occur.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The __________ rule is a rule under which any evidence that is obtained in violation of the accused's rights will not be admissible in criminal court
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word