A scale originally written in English but then translated into Spanish needs to have the same meaning in both languages. This is an example of ______.
A. conceptual equivalence
B. the language barrier
C. translational difference
D. translational equivalence
D. translational equivalence
You might also like to view...
By far the most popular mass audience sport in the 1920s was __________
A) major league baseball B) college football C) amateur golf D) boxing
Why was it surprising that absolutism failed in England?
a) Since Norman times the English kings has enjoyed more direct rule than most of their continental counterparts. b) The English had always shown little tolerance for opinions at odds with those of the monarch. Consider This: James I argued that his kingship existed “before any estates or rankes of men within the same, before any Parliaments were held or laws made. . . .” See 2.4: The Constitutional Alternative. c) English monarchs had always been ready to put down local dissent by force, as with Wales and Scotland. Consider This: James I argued that his kingship existed “before any estates or rankes of men within the same, before any Parliaments were held or laws made. . . .” See 2.4: The Constitutional Alternative. d) The English traditionally held the king’s person dear as the father of the country. Consider This: James I argued that his kingship existed “before any estates or rankes of men within the same, before any Parliaments were held or laws made. . . . ” See 2.4: The Constitutional Alternative.
Russia and Japan reached an agreement in 1941, each side hoping to
a. gain territory. b. protect one flank. c. defeat Germany. d. defeat China.
In 2004, an effort to gain compensation for the survivors and heirs of the 1921 Tulsa race riot through the courts was
a. successful, laying the groundwork for more reparations claims related to past racial discrimination. b. defeated on the ground that compensation would undermine the sovereignty of the state of Oklahoma. c. successful, though the presiding judge cautioned that the unique circumstances of the Tulsa riot made the decision inapplicable to other cases related to past racial discrimination. d. tossed out on the ground that the statute of limitations on the crime in question had already elapsed.