Which of the following should NOT be considered by you for using video conferencing technology when making a sales presentation?
A. To come across a natural person, avoid any practice
B. Place yourself in the viewer's shoes.
C. Make sure everyone has the software or access to the software application for the video conference.
D. Have a contingency plan.
E. Understand how people will interact with you
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
Academic research has found that market rates of return on common stock are the most highly correlated with
a. net income. b. cash flow from operations. c. EBITDA. d. cash flow from investing activities.
Fanny's employer has a qualified pension plan. The employer makes all payments into the plan; employees do not contribute to the plan. During the current year, the employer pays $4,000 into the plan on behalf of Fanny. The plan also earns $3,000 during the year on the balance in Fanny’s retirement account. Which of the following statements is true? I.Fanny is not taxed on the $4,000 in the current year.II.Fanny is not taxed on the $3,000 in the current year.?
A. Only statement I is correct. B. Only statement II is correct. C. Both statements are correct. D. Neither statement is correct.
Kelly, who is on Team A, constantly complains and criticizes her team members; she is playing the role of detractor
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Viktor says he agreed to house-sit for the Deeners for three months for $300 per month, for $900 total. The Deeners say the agreement was for $300 total
If this case went to arbitration, under which condition of contract law would the case most likely be handled? A) Capacity: Viktor would need to prove he was not of sound mind to enter into the agreement. B) Proper form: Viktor would need to produce a written contract because the amount he contends is owed him is over $500. C) Legality: Viktor would need to prove that a housesitting arrangement was an illegal arrangement. D) Acceptance: Viktor would need to produce a written contract to prove that any arrangement had been agreed to in the first place. E) Consideration: Viktor would need to prove that both housesitting and money were items of value that could be exchanged.