An ethical conflict over a relationship with a new client arises in a sales company. Multiple employees have various conflicting opinions and recommendations about the issue. Who is likely to prevail?
a. the highest-level manager involved
b. the party who holds an egoist position
c. the new client
d. the party who holds a utilitarian position
a. the highest-level manager involved
You might also like to view...
Sit-down strikes in which employees occupy their employer's premises are illegal
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Sarah, an employee of Amex Corporation, committed a serious criminal act in an attempt to obtain a large sales order for her employer. A court found her guilty of the felony and also found the corporation guilty of criminal conduct. The company was fined $1 million. The court
a. erred in fining the company since finding both Sarah and the corporation guilty violates the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Constitution. b. acted properly if this were a federal proceeding; however, it did not act properly if this were a state proceeding. c. acted properly in finding Sarah guilty; however it erred in finding the corporation guilty because of the exclusionary rule. d. acted properly in this case.
Which of the following suggestions will enhance the credibility of a researcher?
a. Use tabulations, enumerations, and provide references. b. Use consistent headings, active voice, and a variety of coherence techniques. c. Define terms carefully, support recommendations, and avoid first-person pronouns. d. Identify assumptions, label opinions, and use documentation.
Define marketing citizenship and describe the impact of its dimensions on organizations.
What will be an ideal response?