Is using realtime with a court reporter less expensive than using an electronic recorder? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
In the long run, yes. What may appear to be a short-term saving; that is replacing court reporters with an electronic recorder, will ultimately cost more when taking into consideration the expense of having the recordings transcribed. The transcription process can be very time consuming and expensive which may result in a greater expense than using the court reporter from the beginning.
You might also like to view...
A court's declaration of paternity cannot:
A. Result in an award of retroactive alimony for the mother. B. Result in an award of child support. C. Provide an opportunity for a motion seeking custody. D. Provide a child with inheritance rights through the father.
If an appellate court rules for a remand, this means that the case is being sent back to the trial court for a new trial and correction of errors found on appeal
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A challenge for cause of a juror may be exercised by the attorneys for any reason
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
A party can depose the opposing party
Indicate whether the statement is true or false