When communicating with multilingual audiences, what effect do visual aids create in a document?
A) Visual aids can replace text and aid in communication.
B) Visual aids can add color and lighten the look of the communication.
C) Visual aids can be a distraction when the audience is focused on translation of text.
D) Visual aids can lead to misunderstanding in the interpretation of the content.
E) Visual aids can distract from the formatting of the document.
Answer: A
Explanation: A) Well-designed visual elements can enhance the communication power of textual messages and, in some instances, even replace textual messages. Generally speaking, in a given amount of time, effective images can convey much more information than text. Using pictures is also a helpful way to communicate with multilingual audiences.
You might also like to view...
Which is not one of the characteristics of goals in goal setting theory?
a. Measurable b. Achievable c. General d. Reasonable
The unit improvement factor is not as useful as arithmetic tabulation of learning curve statistics in adjusting time estimates for learning.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Administrative agencies do all of the following except
a. conduct hearings, often calling witnesses. b. enact rules that have the force and effect of law. c. impose financial penalties upon violators of rules. d. review judicial opinions and judgments.
Superfund. Asarco, Inc, had a copper smelter at Ruston, Washington. As part of its op-erations, Asarco produced a by-product called "slag," a hard, rocklike substance. Industrial Min-eral Products (IMP) sold the slag for Asarco to Louisiana-Pacific Corp
and other businesses, which used the slag as a ballast to stabilize the ground at log-sorting yards in Tacoma, Wash-ington. About nine months after IMP stopped selling the slag, it sold substantially all of its assets to L-Bar Products, Inc Government agencies later discovered that the slag reacted with the acidic wood waste in the log-sorting yards, causing heavy metals from the slag to leach into the groundwater and soil. Louisiana-Pacific and the Port of Tacoma sued Asarco under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), claiming that Asarco was liable for cleanup costs. Asarco brought a third party claim against L-Bar as corporate successor to IMP. L-Bar moved for summary judgment, claiming that it was not the successor to IMP and could not be liable under CERCLA for IMP's actions. Will the court agree with L-Bar? Discuss fully.