Integrated theories of white collar crime are best described as those which:
a. incorporate insights from different theoretical traditions and account for white collar crime on several different levels
b. focus on explaining why white collar crime occurs more frequently in integrated as opposed to segregated social settings
c. incorporate all versions of individualistic explanation for crime into a single theory
d. focus on explaining why white collar crimes are cannot be accounted for by reference to any factors applicable to conventional crimes
a. incorporate insights from different theoretical traditions and account for white collar crime on several different levels
You might also like to view...
A major danger of consuming bootleg brew is the risk of poisoning from:
a. mercury b. lead c. arsenic d. beryllium
In order to utilize self-defense, a defendant must reasonably believe that:
a. The aggressor has the ability to cause harm at some point in time. b. The threatened harm is imminent. c. He/she has the present ability to successfully defend herself. d. The aggressor may not retreat.
Which of the following is true regarding stalking?
a. Stalking happens more in the Northwest than other parts of the country. b. Stalking rarely happens on college and university campuses. c. Stalking is also fairly common in college and university settings. d. Anti-Stalking laws have almost eliminated the problem.
Answer the following statements true (T) or false (F)
1. The Campbell Collaboration (C2) is an international research organization founded in 2000 and dedicated to preparing, maintaining, and publicizing systematic reviews of research on the effects of social and educational programs and interventions. 2. Before an evaluation is undertaken, three crucial questions must be answered: Will the findings be used? Is the project evaluable? Who can do this work? 3. The steps in policy analysis are problem formulation, design of instruments, research design (evaluation model), data collection, data analysis, findings and conclusions, and utilization. 4. Obstacles or pitfalls to evaluation research include poor evaluation design and methodology, poor data analysis, unethical evaluations, naive or unprepared evaluation staff, poor relationships between evaluation and program staff, co-optation of evaluation staff and/or design, poor-quality data, poor literature reviews, and focus on method rather than process. 5. The National Advisory Committee on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1976) suggests clear agreements beforehand, assistance from funding agencies in bringing the two parties to suitable agreements, and training programs to acquaint researchers with agency problems and needs.