Explain the effect of the 2004 Supreme Court decision in United States v. Patane in connection with the exclusionary rule and Miranda.
What will be an ideal response?
The Court in Patane affirmed the notion (expressed in Dickerson) that any statement obtained in violation of Miranda will be excluded but that derivative fruit of the poisonous tree is NOT automatically barred by the exclusionary rule applied to Miranda. In Patane, the Court found that the introduction of non-testimonial evidence obtained as a result of voluntary statements does not violate a suspect's constitutional rights under Miranda by negligent or non-deliberate failures to provide full Miranda warnings.
You might also like to view...
The Supreme Court established the foundation of constitutional criminal procedure between 1865 and 1940 in cases involving abuses of Southern justice, except for
A. Use of torture to obtain confessions B. Reference to African American witnesses by first names C. Exclusion of African Americans from juries D. Mob justice
Fifty percent of the total tar in a cigarette is found in the first third of the cigarette
a. True b. False
Identify a true statement about the prisons of eighteenth-century England.
A. They were the primary instruments of punishments. B. They were more likely than their American counterparts to use corporal correction. C. They were mainly used to hold debtors. D. They held pretrial detainees who were guilty of committing misdemeanors.
What is a blanket term describing the many varieties of products attributable to human intellect?
a. IQ development b. Intellectual property c. Smart property d. None of the above