Which of the following are ways to challenge or attack a legal position or argument based on a court opinion?
A. The opinion relied on is mandatory precedent
B. The opinion relied on allows for other possible solutions
C. There are equally relevant cases that do not support the position adopted in the case relied on
D. The court opinion relied on no longer represents sound public policy
E. a and d
F. a, b, and c
G. b, c, and d
Answer: G
You might also like to view...
Objective analysis requires?
A. ?a balanced discussion of an issue or a neutral summary of facts. B. ?a favorable argument for a client. C. ?at least five unbiased primary sources. D. ?a one-sided review of an issue.
Affirmative defenses include:
a. Res judicata b. statute of frauds c. accord and satisfaction d. All of the above
Google is a great tool for law because:
A. Law-related information that appears on Google has been vetted for accuracy. B. Law-related information that appears on Google has been vetted and checked as "good and current law." C. Law-related information that appears on Google is written exclusively by lawyers and judges. D. Google is not the best tool for law-related research.
Legal project management provides historical data for analyzing what worked and what problems occurred
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false