Rick and Kate want to go on a date. Rick wants to go to a rock concert while Kate wants to go to a movie. Rick values going to the concert at $100, while Kate values watching a movie at $50. What is the equilibrium in this situation?
What will be an ideal response?
Because Rick values going to the concert at $100, while Kate values watching a movie at $50, an efficient outcome can be reached if Rick decides to give an amount between $50 and $100 to Kate. Kate will be better off as she will get an amount higher than her valuation for the movie, and Rick will be better off as he will have to pay an amount lower than his value for the concert. Therefore, this equilibrium is efficient. However, the exact amount that Rick will have to pay will depend on his bargaining power.
You might also like to view...
Assume that a firm pays its workers above the market-clearing wage in a competitive industry. Explain how this might be a strategy to mitigate the problem of moral hazard?
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following would be the best measure of the cost of living?
A) consumer price index B) GDP deflator C) real GDP per person D) real GDP
Labor is typically assumed to be the only variable input in very short-run production systems, and the number of variable inputs increases as we lengthen our planning horizon from short run to long run
What happens to the labor demand curve as we move from short run to long run? A) Demand curve becomes less elastic B) Demand curve elasticity does not change C) Demand curve becomes more elastic D) Demand curve becomes upward sloping
When demand falls and supply rises, equilibrium price will _____ and equilibrium quantity will _____.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).