The "clear and present danger" test emerged in the Supreme Court's decision in the case of
A) Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire.
B) Miller v. California.
C) Texas v. Johnson.
D) Reno v. ACLU.
E) Schenck v. United States.
E
You might also like to view...
In which of the following might political action committees (PACs) invest their contributions in order to maximize their political influence?
a. members of the minority party in Congress b. challengers c. incumbents d. presidential candidates
Japan's Lay Judge System
a. is a system whereby a judge may adjudicate a suit between Japanese citizens. b. is a system whereby a panel of randomly selected Japanese citizens rule on civil cases involving corporations. c. permits Japanese citizens who have not attained a law degree to become judges. d. is a reform that made all judgeships in Japan elected positions. e. allows major criminal cases to be heard by a panel consisting of professional judges and randomly chosen Japanese citizens.
Intergovernmental lobbies are at a clear disadvantage when compared to regular lobbies. What can a regular lobby group do that an intergovernmental lobby cannot?
a. Give campaign contributions. b. Meet members of Congress for dinner. c. Employ more than one person to lobby for them. d. Maintain an office in Washington, DC.
In 2004, the Democrat Party could have been considered an opposition party at the national level of government
Indicate whether the statement is true or false