A consulting firm that provides environmental impact reports is asked to assess the impact of a proposed project for a large-scale open pit coal mining operation
Using the Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric, the agency receiving that report evaluates the critical thinking used by the consulting firm as "unacceptable." Describe that category and list the weaknesses that the report probably contained for it to be evaluated as unacceptable.
What will be an ideal response
For the report to be evaluated as unacceptable it must have included most or many of the following mistakes:
†¢ Misinterpretation of evidence, statements, graphics, questions, and so on.
†¢ Failure to identify strong, relevant counterarguments.
†¢ Omitted or superficial evaluations of obvious alternative points of view.
†¢ Presentation of unwarranted or fallacious conclusions.
†¢ Failure to justify all but a few results or procedures, and infrequent explain of reasons.
†¢ Maintenance or defense of views based on self-interest or preconceptions, regardless of the evidence or reasons
You might also like to view...
The form of denying the antecedent is: ________
a. if p then q; p; therefore q b. if p then q; q; therefore p c. if p then q; not q; therefore not p d. if p then q; not p; therefore not q
Behaviorists can be criticized for
a. thinking that aggression is innate in humans. b. being too optimistic about human self-actualization. c. being reductionists. d. not stressing co-operation.
The authors' position on the fact/value distinction can be put by saying that ______
A. there is a big difference between "is" and "ought" B. there is no clear dividing line between them C. all factual statements are really moral statements D. most people can agree on what the distinction is
To involve someone in a scheme of action to which they could not in principle consent to is to
What will be an ideal response?