Explain the "three-strikes" legislation with an example.
What will be an ideal response?
Answers will vary. Habitual offender laws are a form of mandatory sentencing found in twenty-six states and used by the federal government. Also known as "three-strikes-and-you're-out" laws, these statutes require that any person convicted of a third felony must serve a lengthy prison sentence. In many cases, the crime does not have to be of a violent or dangerous nature.The Supreme Court validated the most punitive aspects of habitual offender laws with its decision in Lockyer v. Andrade (2003). That case involved the sentencing under California's "three-strikes" law of Leandro Andrade to fifty years in prison for stealing $153 worth of videotapes. Writing for the majority in a bitterly divided 5-4 decision, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor concluded that Andrade's punishment was not so objectively unreasonable that it violated the Constitution. Basically, the justices who upheld the law said that if the California legislature-and by extension the California voters-felt that the law was reasonable, then the judicial branch was in no position to disagree.
You might also like to view...
________ is the leader of a worldwide terrorism network
A) Theodore Kaczyaski B) The Unabomber C) Timothy McVeigh D) Osama bin Laden E) Terry Nichols
Which of the following statements concerning prison programs is true?
A) They are readily available to prisoners. B) Legislators today are financially supportive of prisoner programs. C) More programs tend to increase hostilities in prisons. D) Classification of prisoners and assignment to various programs are often based on the needs of the institution. E) Few inmates are interested in becoming involved in programs.
Present sense impression
What will be an ideal response?
The minimum coverage for vehicle liability insurance for bodily injury to or death of all persons as a result of any one accident is:
a. $5,000 b. $15,000 c. $30,000 d. $50,000