In Menechino v. Oswald, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
A. the procedure of affording an opportunity for the offender to be heard and then telling him how he falls short of qualifying for parole is sufficient due process.
B. parolees do not have the right to due process in parole decisions.
C. counsel may talk for the prisoner during the hearing.
D. the state has to provide counsel to indigent parolees facing revocation.
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
The most common gang behavior is hanging out
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Explain the purpose and possible grounds for a motion to suppress
What will be an ideal response?
The distinction between principles and accessories is only important in misdemeanors and felonies. Only in treason are all parties principles
a. True b. False
Identify four categories of drugs that are abused. Include a specific example from each category.
What will be an ideal response?