Jerry is involved in a hit-and-run accident while riding his bike. Marge sees the accident occur, realizes that Jerry is slowly dying on the road, yet she continues to walk home. Later that evening, Marge sees on the nightly news that Jerry has died. In what types of situations are you liable to help someone? Was Marge liable for the death of Jerry? Why or why not? If Marge had started to take Jerry to the hospital, but dropped him off a block before the destination because she was running late, would she be liable for the death of Jerry? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
There are different situations where an individual has a duty to intervene. Marge appears to be a stranger and does not have any relation to Jerry. As a result, she would not be held liable for the death of Jerry. If Marge started to take Jerry to the hospital, then Marge assumed a duty of care that she must follow through. By abandoning Jerry a block away, Marge also abandoned her legal duty and she would be liable for Jerry’s death.
You might also like to view...
Describe why judges are held to an even higher standard than other lawyers.
What will be an ideal response?
If we have a small sample size being investigated, the level of significance best to use might be:
a. .001. b. .01 c. .0001. d. .05.
Excessive use of force violates the _________ Amendment?
A. First B. Second C. Third D. Fourth E. Fifth
When probable cause exists, this case permits the police to conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle and any closed containers in the vehicle
What will be an ideal response?