In the Shrimp Importation Case, the WTO Appellate Body determined that:
A) the U.S. program certifying the use of TEDs or devices of comparable effectiveness was an unjustified discrimination against Malaysian shrimp products
B) the U.S. program certifying the use of TEDs or devices of comparable effectiveness was not an unjustified discrimination against Malaysian shrimp products.
C) the U.S. program was invalid because it treated Malaysian shrimp differently than shrimp from other countries.
D) the U.S. program was valid as it related to conservation of an exhaustible natural resource.
B
You might also like to view...
Evidence obtained from an illegal search may not be used against the defendant. This is called
A. bloom of the illegal bush. B. flower of the unlawful fruit. C. fruit of the poisonous tree. D. sticker of the criminal shrub.
Price setting is usually determined by ________ in large companies
A) top managers B) external stakeholders C) product managers D) non-executive employees E) the sales department
An independent hardware retail store is 100 miles from the nearest city of more than 5,000 people and provides needed supplies for area ranchers. This hardware store would most likely buy its plumbing and electrical supplies through a ________
A) truck jobber B) commission merchant C) mail-order wholesaler D) rack jobber E) merchandise broker
What is the difference between behavior intention and actual behavior?
a. Behavior is what you want to do. Behavior intention is what you actually do. b. Behavior is what you want to do. Behavior intention reflects a person’s feelings toward a specific object or person. c. Behavior intention is the sum of underlying beliefs. Behavior is what you actually do. d. Behavior intention is what you want to do. Behavior is what you actually do.