In The Blacksmith and the Baker, the judge pronounces a sentence. What is his justification?
A. The baker is guilty and must be punished.
B. The blacksmith's crime was unintentional; therefore, he cannot be punished.
C. The blacksmith must be punished for his crime, and nobody can take his place.
D. The baker can be punished even if he is innocent because he is expendable, but the blacksmith is not.
D. The baker can be punished even if he is innocent because he is expendable, but the blacksmith is not.
You might also like to view...
INSTRUCTIONS: Select the answer that best characterizes each argument. Adopt the Aristotelian standpoint. It is false that some leprechauns are Englishmen. Therefore, no leprechauns are Englishmen
A) Invalid; existential fallacy. B) Valid; no fallacy. C) Invalid; illicit contradiction. D) Invalid; illicit subalternation. E) Invalid; illicit conversion.
Which of the following is considered a moral evil by Plato?
What will be an ideal response?
When we seek to study truth by using only one source we are involved in __________
a. monologue b. myth c. dialogue d. interpretation
This type of ethical relativism holds that ethical judgments are the result of the moral outlook and attitudes of particular persons:
A) ?Cultural relativism. B) ?Individual relativism. C) ?Objectivism. D) ?Atheism.