Compare and contrast Proactive personality and Core Self-Evaluations. How are these two concepts the same, and how are they different?
What will be an ideal response?
Core Self-Evaluations is a relatively new personality trait concept; however, it is comprised of four of the oldest and most frequently studied personality traits: Emotional Stability, Self-Esteem, Locus of Control, and Generalized Self-Efficacy. Judge et al. defined Core Self-Evaluations this way:
Core Self-Evaluations is a higher-order concept representing the fundamental evaluations that people make about themselves and their functioning in the environment. Individuals with positive Core Self-Evaluations appraise themselves in a consistently positive manner across situations; such individuals see themselves as capable, worthy, and in control of their lives. (2004, pp. 326–327)
As defined in this study (Thomas et al., 2010, p. 276), “Proactive personality reflects a relatively stable dispositional tendency for individuals to control situational forces and actively incite change in their environments” (e.g., Bateman & Crant, 1993) [italics and boldface added]. A proactive orientation may be especially important during turbulent times (Bateman & Crant, 2010, p. 276): “Proactive employees who succeed within these dynamic environments do so by realizing that they do not have to play the hand they were dealt. Rather, top performers tend to proactively create circumstances that facilitate personal and organizational success.”
Proactive personality may be closely related to the internal locus of control dimension of Core Self-Evaluations, which is defined in the text this way: Locus of Control, by the way, refers to the belief that you control what happens to you. People with an External Locus of Control believe that outside forces—chance, fate, luck, other people—determine what happens to them; conversely, people with an Internal Locus of Control believe that they determine their own destiny through their own actions and efforts.
You might also like to view...
Tessmer Kennel uses tenant-days as its measure of activity; an animal housed in the kennel for one day is counted as one tenant-day. During January, the kennel budgeted for 3,100 tenant-days, but its actual level of activity was 3,090 tenant-days. The kennel has provided the following data concerning the formulas used in its budgeting and its actual results for January:Data used in budgeting: Fixed element per monthVariable element per tenant-dayRevenue - $33.60 Wages and salaries$3,500 $7.40Food and supplies 500 10.50Facility expenses 9,500 4.70Administrative expenses 6,600 0.30Total expenses$ 20,100 $ 22.90Actual results for January: Revenue$105,934Wages and salaries$27,186Food and supplies$32,485Facility expenses$24,873Administrative expenses$7,557The
net operating income in the flexible budget for January would be closest to: (Round your intermediate calculations to 2 decimal places.) A. $13,788 B. $12,963 C. $13,878 D. $13,070
What is the drawback of the default correlation measure and what alternative measure is used in measuring portfolio credit risk?
What will be an ideal response?
A stock is selling for $32.70. The strike price on a call, maturing in 6 months, is $35. The possible stock prices at the end of 6 months are $39.50 and $28.40. If interest rates are 6.0%, what is the option price?
A) $1.90 B) $2.80 C) $3.40 D) $4.20
KARLEE's steps of customer focus, leadership, involvement of people, process approach, system approach, continual improvement, and factual approach are collectively called the:
a. KARLEE code. b. gold standard. c. exemplification of principles of total quality in its business practices. d. standards of care.