Contrast generalization and reductionism. Which would be more important in understanding a complex phenomenon such as the impact of Jeremiah's stroke from the textbook introduction, and why?
What will be an ideal response?
Generalization involves making a general conclusion based on many observations of similar phenomena, whereas reductionism is understanding the processes that underlie the phenomena. In Jeremiah's case, generalization would be helpful in that scientists would have many examples of others who have been similarly afflicted by stroke. Treatment options could be mirrored to better help Jeremiah's recovery. In contrast, reductionism would help scientists and doctors understand what, exactly, happened in Jeremiah's brain. Ultimately, generalization would likely be more beneficial to Jeremiah and his recovery.
You might also like to view...
According to Wilding and Valentine, individuals with exceptional memories have all of the following characteristics EXCEPT for
a. using learned memory strategies. b. having specialized interests and knowledge that make certain information easier to encode. c. having naturally superior memory abilities, such as vivid mental images. d. having superior intellectual abilities or differently structured brains.
The "primary" colors of light are _________, and mixed together, they form _________
a. red, yellow, and blue; white b. red, yellow, and blue; brown c. red, green, and blue; white d. red, green, and blue; brown
The reason a violin sounds different than a clarinet is that they
a. produce different pitches. b. each have a different timbre. c. are played differently. d. have distinct simple frequencies. e. each have different fundamental frequencies.
Dr. Solomon wants a record of the electrical activity in her patient's brain during an epileptic seizure. She would schedule the patient for a _____ appointment
a) magnetic resonance imaging b) electroencephalograph c) positron-emission tomography d) microelectrode testing