What are the consequences in evaluating a program with a program theory that is not sound, and what can be done to correct the problem?
What will be an ideal response?
A program whose design is weak or faulty has little prospect for success even if it adequately implements that design. Thus, if the program theory is not sound, there may be little reason to assess other evaluation issues, such as the program’s implementation, impact, or efficiency. Within the framework of evaluability assessment, finding that the program theory is poorly defined or seriously flawed indicates that the program simply is not yet evaluable.
When assessment of program theory reveals deficiencies, one appropriate response is for the responsible parties to redesign the program. Such program reconceptualization may include (a) clarifying goals and objectives; (b)?restructuring program components for which the intended activities are not happening, needed, or reasonable; and (c) working with stakeholders to obtain consensus about the logic that connects program activities with the desired outcomes. The evaluator may guide or facilitate this process.
You might also like to view...
Clean water, interstate highways, public libraries, state parks, these are all examples of __________ used by individuals in the community
a. advertorials b. purposive benefits c. public goods d. solidary benefits
Public policy is rooted in law and in the authority and coercion associated with law
A. true B. false
George Kennan refused to offer any comments about how to react to the Soviet government after World War II
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
For over four hundred years, the norm of ________ has identified states as the primary actors in international relations.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).